Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Reed v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, 3:16-cv-01042-JR. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20180105b33 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING A WARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS JOLIE A. RUSSO , Magistrate Judge . ORDER Based upon the Plaintiffs Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiffs attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $ 5,864.11 and expenses $ 9.31 and costs of $ 11.40 , if not subject to any offset al
More

ORDER GRANTING A WARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS

ORDER

Based upon the Plaintiffs Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiffs attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $5,864.11 and expenses $9.31 and costs of $11.40, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer