Najm v. City of Portland, 3:17-cv-01714-SB. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20180718d14
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#23) on June 29, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. U
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#23) on June 29, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. Un..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#23) on June 29, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [23]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees [16] is granted. Plaintiff is awarded $8,377.50 in attorney's fees and $504.82 in costs and expenses, for a total award of $8,882.32.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
