Sprayberry v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, 3:17-CV-00112-SB. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20180720c56
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [53] on April 11, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [14] and deny as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice [29]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Defendant filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Def.'s
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [53] on April 11, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [14] and deny as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice [29]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Defendant filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Def.'s O..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [53] on April 11, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [14] and deny as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice [29]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Defendant filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Def.'s Obj., ECF 55. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Defendant's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [53] denying Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [14]. The Court also DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice [29].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
