Evox Productions, LLC v. Chrome Data Solutions, LP, 3:16-cv-00057-JR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20181120f55
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Papak 1 issued a Findings & Recommendation (#101) on September 6, 2018, in which he recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's contract-based claims and grant in part the motion as to Plaintiff's copyright claim. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Papak 1 issued a Findings & Recommendation (#101) on September 6, 2018, in which he recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's contract-based claims and grant in part the motion as to Plaintiff's copyright claim. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). W..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Papak1 issued a Findings & Recommendation (#101) on September 6, 2018, in which he recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's contract-based claims and grant in part the motion as to Plaintiff's copyright claim. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [101], and therefore, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [77] is granted as to the contract-based claims and granted as to the copyright claim except for conduct occurring after January 13, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. After the filing of the Findings & Recommendation, this case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Russo.
Source: Leagle
