Brown v. Baker County Dept of Human Services, 2:17-cv-01690-SU. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190109a55
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#71) on December 6, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#71) on December 6, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. R..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#71) on December 6, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [71]. Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss [61, 63] are granted. The claims are dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, Geoffrey Brown is dismissed as a plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
