Kenneth K. v. Berryhill, 3:17-cv-01271-JR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190111e90
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation (#31) on December 19, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation we
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation (#31) on December 19, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation wer..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation (#31) on December 19, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [31]. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party or parties in this case.
Source: Leagle
