Iniguez v. Templin, 2:17-cv-01513-SB. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190205e42
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [35] on January 11, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [26] and deny Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [32] as moot. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [35] on January 11, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [26] and deny Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [32] as moot. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [35] on January 11, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [26] and deny Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [32] as moot. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [35]. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [26] is denied and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [32] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
