Zukowska v.United States Department of Homeland Security, 3:17-cv-00354-HZ. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190415g95
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [82] on December 28, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [66] and dismiss this case with prejudice and without leave to amend. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 8
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [82] on December 28, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [66] and dismiss this case with prejudice and without leave to amend. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 85..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [82] on December 28, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [66] and dismiss this case with prejudice and without leave to amend. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 85. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation [82]. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [66] is GRANTED. This case is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
