Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Barnett v. Ubimodo, Inc., 6:18-cv-418-MC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20190528c10 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 24, 2019
Latest Update: May 24, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL J. McSHANE , District Judge . Plaintiff Kelly Barnett moves this Court for entry of default against Defendant the Soteria Institute and its Advisory Board/Board of Directors. Pl.'s Mot., ECF No. 100. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's Motion, ECF No. 100, is DENIED. This Court denied Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default on April 30, 2019. Op. and Order 4-5, ECF No. 96 (explaining that an entry of default would be improper because Plaintiff never prope
More

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Kelly Barnett moves this Court for entry of default against Defendant the Soteria Institute and its Advisory Board/Board of Directors. Pl.'s Mot., ECF No. 100. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's Motion, ECF No. 100, is DENIED.

This Court denied Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default on April 30, 2019. Op. and Order 4-5, ECF No. 96 (explaining that an entry of default would be improper because Plaintiff never properly served the Soteria Institute). Plaintiff was the given 14 days to effectuate service on the Soteria Institute. Id. at 5. Plaintiff again moves for an entry of default against the Soteria Institute, arguing that she "made service by mailing the request for Notice of Default" to the Soteria Institute's address, 161 S. Oak St., Suite 151, Sisters, OR 97759. Pl.'s Mot. 2, ECF No. 100. Because Plaintiff still fails to demonstrate effective service of summons and the operative complaint on the Soteria Institute's registered agent, Michael Corning, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1), her Motion for Notice of Default, ECF No. 100, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer