Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hershey v. Kaber, l:18-cv-01888-CL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20190614b22 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL J. McSHANE , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report & Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 29, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the R&R. ECF No. 31. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no er
More

OPINION AND ORDER

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report & Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 29, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the R&R. ECF No. 31. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude that the report is correct. Judge Clark's R&R is adopted in full. Defendants' motions to dismiss with prejudice, ECF Nos. 11, 13, 15, are GRANTED and this case DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for judicial notice, ECF No. 28, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer