Stay Frosty Enterprises, LLC v. Amazon.com Inc., 3:18-cv-00283-SB. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190813a43
Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [109] on June 6, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Teespring's Motion to Sever and Motion to Transfer Venue [94]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obliga
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [109] on June 6, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Teespring's Motion to Sever and Motion to Transfer Venue [94]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligat..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [109] on June 6, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Teespring's Motion to Sever and Motion to Transfer Venue [94]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [109]. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Teespring's motions to sever and transfer and DENIES its motion to dismiss [94]. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Teespring are severed from this action and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
