Luczkow v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:18-cv-00480-MC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190830d20
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS MICHAEL J. McSHANE , District Judge . ORDER Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $ 6,657.17 and expenses $ 8.78 and costs of $ 13.60 , if not subject to any offset al
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS MICHAEL J. McSHANE , District Judge . ORDER Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $ 6,657.17 and expenses $ 8.78 and costs of $ 13.60 , if not subject to any offset all..
More
ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS
MICHAEL J. McSHANE, District Judge.
ORDER
Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $6,657.17 and expenses $8.78 and costs of $13.60, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office.
Source: Leagle
