OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN, District Judge.

On August 26, 2019, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued his Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [16], recommending that the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and this case be REMANDED for further proceedings. Neither party objected.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the comi, to which any paiiy may file written objections. The comi is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de nova determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

CONCLUSION

Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderk's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [16] in full. I REVERSE the Commissioner's decision and REMAND this action for further proceedings consistent with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.