Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Riegel v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:18-cv-00436-JO. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20191209642 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS ORDER ROBERT E. JONES , District Judge . Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $ 7,927.65 and expenses $ 6.90 and costs of $ 10.10 , if not subject to any offset allowe
More

ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS

ORDER

Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $7,927.65 and expenses $6.90 and costs of $10.10, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer