Murray v. Transportation Media, Inc., 3:19-cv-00180-JR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20191230316
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#63) on October 17, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommen
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#63) on October 17, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommend..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#63) on October 17, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Defendant's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [63], and therefore, Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis [52] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
