Wilson v. Colorado, 6:19-cv-799-MK. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20200106a51
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL McSHANE , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9 th Cir. 1981). I find no error and c
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL McSHANE , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9 th Cir. 1981). I find no error and co..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL McSHANE, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.
While the Court is sympathetic to the fact that Plaintiff needs a vehicle for work, and has many years with a good driving record, the fact remains that he seeks to challenge a decades old final judgment from another state. As noted by Judge Kasubhai, this Court lacks jurisdiction over such claims.
Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted. Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
