McKELVEY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 223 A.3d 672 (2020)
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Number: inpaco20200128676
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . AND NOW, this 28 th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Should this Court grant allocatur in this case of first impression concerning a matter of substantial public importance because the opinion below treated similarly situated applicants on the same record with varying degrees of success and, alternative
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . AND NOW, this 28 th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Should this Court grant allocatur in this case of first impression concerning a matter of substantial public importance because the opinion below treated similarly situated applicants on the same record with varying degrees of success and, alternativel..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Should this Court grant allocatur in this case of first impression concerning a matter of substantial public importance because the opinion below treated similarly situated applicants on the same record with varying degrees of success and, alternatively, did not exercise its discretion to remand for further fact finding?
Source: Leagle
