Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE ROSARIO, 16-14694 ELF. (2016)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: inbco20160927593 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER ERIC L. FRANK , Bankruptcy Judge . AND NOW, WHEREAS: A. On August 15, 2016, following an evidentiary hearing, this court entered an order ("the Prior Order") (Doc. # 28) in which the court, inter alia, held South Philly Auto Sales, Inc. ("South Philly Auto") in CONTEMPT OF COURT for violation of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. 362(a) and the court's Order dated August 11, 2016, (Doc. # 23). B. The Prior Order granted the Debtor certain civil contempt remedies and, in Parag
More

ORDER

AND NOW, WHEREAS:

A. On August 15, 2016, following an evidentiary hearing, this court entered an order ("the Prior Order") (Doc. # 28) in which the court, inter alia, held South Philly Auto Sales, Inc. ("South Philly Auto") in CONTEMPT OF COURT for violation of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and the court's Order dated August 11, 2016, (Doc. # 23).

B. The Prior Order granted the Debtor certain civil contempt remedies and, in Paragraph 7, scheduled a hearing on September 22, 2016 to consider the award of additional civil contempt remedies.

C. Pursuant to Paragraph 9 of the Prior Order, gave South Philly Auto notice of the additional remedies requested and the hearing scheduled on September 22, 2016.

D. The court held a hearing on September 22, 2016, at which time South Philly Auto failed to appear.

E. Based on the evidence presented at the September 22, 2016 hearing, the court finds that the Debtor is entitled to additional remedies in the form of compensatory damages and an award of counsel fees. See, e.g., In re Meyers, 344 B.R. 61, 66 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2006) (upon a finding of civil contempt, a bankruptcy court has the power to issue sanctions such as costs, compensatory damages and attorneys' fees) (citing cases); see also Quinter v. Volkswagen of Am., 676 F.2d 969, 974-75 (3d Cir. 1982).

F. Compensatory damages for contempt may include an award of damages for emotional distress. See In re Manzanares, 345 B.R. 773, 794-95 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2006); In re Feldmeier, 335 B.R. 807, 814 (Bankr. D. Or. 2005); In re Reno, 299 B.R. 823, 829-30 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003); see also Meyers, 344 B.R. at 66-67.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. As a remedy for civil contempt, the Debtor is awarded compensatory damages against South Philly Auto in the amount of $12,362.49 ("the Damages Award").1

2. As a remedy for civil contempt, the Debtor is awarded counsel fees in the amount of $5,164.20 ("the Fee Award").2

3. To enforce the Damages Award, the Debtor may:

a. set off the Damages Award against her secured indebtedness to South Philly Auto; and/or; b. reduce the Damages Award to a money judgment by filing a request that the Clerk enter a money judgment in favor of the Debtor and against South Philly Auto.

4. South Philly Auto shall satisfy the Fee Award on or before October 28, 2016.

5. Failure to comply with Paragraph 4 may result in additional sanctions, including additional attorney's fees.

6. The Debtor shall serve this Order on South Philly Auto on or before September 30, 2016 and promptly thereafter file a Certification of Service.

FootNotes


1. Following the format (roughly) of the Debtor's itemization filed with the court on September 9, 2016 (Doc. # 35), I find the Debtor is entitled to an award for the following categories of compensatory damages: school loan reimbursement $4,345.00 cash benefit repayment obligation 206.00 transportation expenses incurred 213.00 medical expense incurred 545.00 emotional distress damages 5,000.00 repairs to repossessed automobile 2,053.49 __________ TOTAL $12,362.49

I have not included in the award $4,465.00 for an asserted repayment obligation for child care benefits previously provided to the Debtor. The Debtor failed to meet her burden of proof on this claimed damages component.

2. The Fee Award is based on the itemization the Debtor's counsel filed with the court, (Doc. # 36), that was made part of the evidentiary record on September 22, 2016.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer