U.S. v. LOTT, 04-786. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120123389
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE III, Judge. AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant "for reconsideration of sentence pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)" (Doc. #72) and supplemental motion of defendant for reduction of his sentence (Doc. #76) are GRANTED to the extent that he seeks a reduction of three months on his term of imprisonment for Counts I and III. Defendant's sentence is redu
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE III, Judge. AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant "for reconsideration of sentence pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)" (Doc. #72) and supplemental motion of defendant for reduction of his sentence (Doc. #76) are GRANTED to the extent that he seeks a reduction of three months on his term of imprisonment for Counts I and III. Defendant's sentence is reduc..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE III, Judge.
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of defendant "for reconsideration of sentence pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)" (Doc. #72) and supplemental motion of defendant for reduction of his sentence (Doc. #76) are GRANTED to the extent that he seeks a reduction of three months on his term of imprisonment for Counts I and III. Defendant's sentence is reduced to 100 months' imprisonment on Counts I and III plus a consecutive term of 60 months' imprisonment on Count II for a total sentence of 160 months' imprisonment. All other terms and conditions of the original sentence shall remain unchanged; and
(2) the motions are otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle
