Filed: Mar. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge. AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29), the opposition in response (Docket No. 35), and the reply thereto (Docket No. 39), and following oral argument on March 1, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff. This
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge. AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29), the opposition in response (Docket No. 35), and the reply thereto (Docket No. 39), and following oral argument on March 1, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff. This c..
More
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29), the opposition in response (Docket No. 35), and the reply thereto (Docket No. 39), and following oral argument on March 1, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff. This case is closed.
