Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 9), the plaintiff's opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 9), the plaintiff's opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference s..
More
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 9), the plaintiff's opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference scheduled for March 29, 2012 is CANCELED. This case is closed.
