Filed: Apr. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 11 th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. — Objections are overruled. 2. The Motion for Reconsideration of Exceptional Circumstance to October 13, 2011 Order is DENIED. 3. The Motion to Schedule a Hearin
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 11 th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. — Objections are overruled. 2. The Motion for Reconsideration of Exceptional Circumstance to October 13, 2011 Order is DENIED. 3. The Motion to Schedule a Hearing..
More
ORDER
EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. — Objections are overruled.
2. The Motion for Reconsideration of Exceptional Circumstance to October 13, 2011 Order is DENIED.
3. The Motion to Schedule a Hearing on Bond and/or an Order Releasing Petitioner from State Confinement is DENIED.
4. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
