PHILLIPS v. TRANSUNION, LLC, 12-1058. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120427a60
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25 th day of April , 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Transunion, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) (ECF No. 14), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Counterclaim is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Penn
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25 th day of April , 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Transunion, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) (ECF No. 14), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Counterclaim is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Penns..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Transunion, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) (ECF No. 14), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant's Counterclaim is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
