STOUT v. ASTRUE, 11-1826. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120525b71
Visitors: 21
Filed: May 23, 2012
Latest Update: May 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW , this 23rd day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the plaintiff's request for review, the defendant's response thereto, and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document #19), there being no objections filed by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's request for revie
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW , this 23rd day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the plaintiff's request for review, the defendant's response thereto, and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document #19), there being no objections filed by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's request for review..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the plaintiff's request for review, the defendant's response thereto, and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document #19), there being no objections filed by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff's request for review is DENIED.
3. Judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner and against the plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
