Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LAWLER v. RICHARDSON, 10-196. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20120622d22 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this ___ day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for a New Trial (Doc. 66), and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 67), and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED.

ORDER

PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.

AND NOW, this ___ day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for a New Trial (Doc. 66), and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 67), and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer