COLEMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, 10-3025. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120627d38
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25th day of June 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell. United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. 3. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss as Moot/Application for Stay is
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge. AND NOW, this 25th day of June 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell. United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. 3. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss as Moot/Application for Stay is G..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 25th day of June 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell. United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
3. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss as Moot/Application for Stay is GRANTED.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
