CAMERON v. ASTRUE, 11-3250. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120731a58
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge. AND NOW, this 27 th day of July , 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff Susan Cameron's Request for Nos. 3, 9), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (ECF No. 16), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED. 2. Judgment is entered REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for the purposes of this remand only. 3. The matter is REMANDED for further proc
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge. AND NOW, this 27 th day of July , 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff Susan Cameron's Request for Nos. 3, 9), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (ECF No. 16), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED. 2. Judgment is entered REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for the purposes of this remand only. 3. The matter is REMANDED for further proce..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff Susan Cameron's Request for Nos. 3, 9), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (ECF No. 16), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED.
2. Judgment is entered REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for the purposes of this remand only.
3. The matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
