WEBB v. BOROUGH, 11-7834. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120803680
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, Judge. AND NOW, ____ this ____ 24 th ____ day of July 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31; Doc. No. 32) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: • Defendant Lebo's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) as to Counts IV-VI (state law claims) is GRANTED. • Defendant Siana's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) as to Counts I and II (Section 1983 claims) is GRANTED. • The remaining claims in Defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. No 31; Doc.
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, Judge. AND NOW, ____ this ____ 24 th ____ day of July 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31; Doc. No. 32) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: • Defendant Lebo's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) as to Counts IV-VI (state law claims) is GRANTED. • Defendant Siana's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) as to Counts I and II (Section 1983 claims) is GRANTED. • The remaining claims in Defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. No 31; Doc. ..
More
ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, Judge.
AND NOW, ____ this ____ 24th ____ day of July 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31; Doc. No. 32) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
• Defendant Lebo's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) as to Counts IV-VI (state law claims) is GRANTED.
• Defendant Siana's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) as to Counts I and II (Section 1983 claims) is GRANTED.
• The remaining claims in Defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. No 31; Doc. No. 32) are DENIED without prejudice to raise the claims again at a later stage of the litigation process.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant Gerber's supplemental motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
