Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge. AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40), the plaintiffs' opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, the defendant's supplemental letter submission, after oral argument on the motion on July 10, 2012, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiffs' claims for b
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge. AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40), the plaintiffs' opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, the defendant's supplemental letter submission, after oral argument on the motion on July 10, 2012, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiffs' claims for br..
More
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40), the plaintiffs' opposition thereto, the defendant's brief in reply, the defendant's supplemental letter submission, after oral argument on the motion on July 10, 2012, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract (Count I) are DISMISSED. The plaintiffs' claims for bad faith (Count II) are DISMISSED except with respect to the allegation that the defendant acted in bad faith in investigating their 2009 insurance claim.
The Court will hold a telephone conference on August 3, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. to discuss scheduling the remainder of the case. Plaintiffs' counsel shall initiate the call.
