ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY, INC. v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, 10-7453. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120803855
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for partial summary judgment (Docket Nos. 25 and 34) 1 , all documents filed in connection therewith, and the Hearing held on December 15, 2011, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. FootNotes 1. Defendant originally filed this Motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment as to all of Plaintiff's claims an
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for partial summary judgment (Docket Nos. 25 and 34) 1 , all documents filed in connection therewith, and the Hearing held on December 15, 2011, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. FootNotes 1. Defendant originally filed this Motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment as to all of Plaintiff's claims and..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for partial summary judgment (Docket Nos. 25 and 34)1, all documents filed in connection therewith, and the Hearing held on December 15, 2011, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant originally filed this Motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment as to all of Plaintiff's claims and Defendant's counterclaims. Defendant notified the Court in its Reply Brief (Docket No. 34), that it has amended its Motion to seek only partial summary judgment on a limited issue of contract interpretation. (CWA Reply Br. at 1.)
Source: Leagle
