Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DADE v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., 13-1381. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130709c74 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. YOHN, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2013, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by defendants, Gaudenzia DRC, Inc., Shakiya Drummond, Sharronna Holmes, Melvin Thompson, Erin Sutton, and Patricia O'Connor (Doc. # 12), and plaintiff's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 based on the Health Insurance Portability and Accountabilit
More

ORDER

WILLIAM H. YOHN, Jr., District Judge.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2013, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by defendants, Gaudenzia DRC, Inc., Shakiya Drummond, Sharronna Holmes, Melvin Thompson, Erin Sutton, and Patricia O'Connor (Doc. # 12), and plaintiff's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to all defendants. 2. Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to defendants Gaudenzia DRC, Inc., and Melvin Thompson. 3. The balance of defendants' motion is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer