WILLIAMS v. COLVIN, 12-3370. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20130823b94
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2013
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 20 th day of August, 2013, upon independent review of the brief in support of review filed by Plaintiff (Docket No. 9), Defendant's response thereto (Docket No. 11), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation are APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The final decision of the Comm
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 20 th day of August, 2013, upon independent review of the brief in support of review filed by Plaintiff (Docket No. 9), Defendant's response thereto (Docket No. 11), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation are APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The final decision of the Commi..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2013, upon independent review of the brief in support of review filed by Plaintiff (Docket No. 9), Defendant's response thereto (Docket No. 11), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation are APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The final decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits to Plaintiff is VACATED;
3. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report; and
4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
FootNotes
1. Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, she is substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this case. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
