PITTS v. KERESTES, 12-2661. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20130904c56
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The petitioner's objectio
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The petitioner's objection..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,
4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
