Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC., 2:06-cv-1797 (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130314f29 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 13 th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Patent Issues (06-1797, doc. no. 518), the End Payor Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (06-1833, doc. no. 233), and Apotex's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Antitrust Liability and Monopoly Power (06-2768, doc. no. 601), Cephalon and the Generic Defendants' responses thereto,
More

ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Patent Issues (06-1797, doc. no. 518), the End Payor Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (06-1833, doc. no. 233), and Apotex's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Antitrust Liability and Monopoly Power (06-2768, doc. no. 601), Cephalon and the Generic Defendants' responses thereto, and the replies, and for the reasons detailed in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

The Direct Purchasers' motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the opinion. The End Payors' motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the opinion. Apotex's motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the opinion. The monopoly power portion of Apotex's motion will be resolved separately.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer