Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. EX REL. KNISELY v. CINTAS CORPORATION, INC., 10-1193. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140317c63 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of defendant Cintas Corporation Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry #37), plaintiff Douglas Knisely's response in opposition thereto, Cintas's motion for leave to file a reply to that response (docket entry #43), and Knisely's motion for leave to file a surreply (docket entry #44), and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion for leave
More

ORDER

STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of defendant Cintas Corporation Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry #37), plaintiff Douglas Knisely's response in opposition thereto, Cintas's motion for leave to file a reply to that response (docket entry #43), and Knisely's motion for leave to file a surreply (docket entry #44), and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry #43) is GRANTED;

2. The motion for leave to file a surreply (docket entry #44) is GRANTED;

3. Cintas's motion to dismiss (docket entry #37) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum;

4. By noon on March 21, 2014, the parties shall jointly INFORM the Court by facsimile (215-580-2156) whether settlement discussions with Magistrate Judge Hart would likely be productive; and

5. Further scheduling shall ABIDE the Court's receipt of that submission.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer