ROBINSON v. WETZEL, 13-3131. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140320708
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ, District Judge. AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Henry Robinson's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, to which no objections have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Document 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ, District Judge. AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Henry Robinson's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, to which no objections have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Document 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is ..
More
ORDER
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Henry Robinson's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Document 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is placed in suspense pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2014);
3. Petitioner and Respondents shall notify the court within 30 days of the conclusion of the proceedings in the Cunningham case so the habeas petition may proceed;
4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place this matter in civil SUSPENSE pending further order of this Court.
FootNotes
1. The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on January 30, 2014, together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within 14 days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) ("Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and subsections 1(c) and (d) of this Rule within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof."). As of today's date, no objections have been filed.
Source: Leagle
