KNITTEL v. COLVIN, 13-3499. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140408a88
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW , this 7th day of April, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review and the response thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED , the rel
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW , this 7th day of April, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review and the response thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED , the reli..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review and the response thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, the relief requested by Plaintiff is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED so that the Administrative Law Judge can explicitly consider Plaintiff's moderate limitation in concentration, persistence or pace when determining Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, when posing a hypothetical question to the vocational expert and at steps four and five of the sequential evaluation process.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
