CALLAHAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, 14-791. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140411b03
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 9th day of April 2014, upon consideration of (1) Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket Entry 5), Plaintiff's Opposition thereto (Docket Entry 6), Defendant's Reply (Docket Entry 9), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS : 1. The Motion is GRANTED; 2. Venue in this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Southern Division;
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 9th day of April 2014, upon consideration of (1) Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket Entry 5), Plaintiff's Opposition thereto (Docket Entry 6), Defendant's Reply (Docket Entry 9), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS : 1. The Motion is GRANTED; 2. Venue in this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Southern Division; a..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of April 2014, upon consideration of (1) Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket Entry 5), Plaintiff's Opposition thereto (Docket Entry 6), Defendant's Reply (Docket Entry 9), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Motion is GRANTED;
2. Venue in this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Southern Division; and
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case closed.
Source: Leagle
