McCREADY v. WOMBLE, 11-7670. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140423c63
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this ____ day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants City of Philadelphia and Waymon Womble's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 38), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendants' motion is DENIED. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter shall have a TRIAL DATE CERTAIN of May 12, 2014. The parties should refer to the Court's Policies and Procedures for all relevan
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this ____ day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants City of Philadelphia and Waymon Womble's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 38), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendants' motion is DENIED. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter shall have a TRIAL DATE CERTAIN of May 12, 2014. The parties should refer to the Court's Policies and Procedures for all relevant..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ____ day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants City of Philadelphia and Waymon Womble's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 38), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendants' motion is DENIED.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter shall have a TRIAL DATE CERTAIN of May 12, 2014. The parties should refer to the Court's Policies and Procedures for all relevant pre-trial deadlines.2
FootNotes
1. This Order accompanies the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated April 22, 2014.
2. https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/procedures/tucpol.pdf
Source: Leagle
