FRANKENTEK RESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS, LLC v. BUERGER, 2:12-cv-00767 (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140425982
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. AND NOW, this ___ 24 th ___ day of April, 2014, in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00767, it is ORDERED as follows: • My March 27, 2014 order [ECF No. 65] is VACATED; • Frankentek's motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaims is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: • On the breach of contract counterclaims, the motion is DENIED; • On the Pennsylvania statutory counterclaim and the New Jersey statutory counterclaim, the motio
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. AND NOW, this ___ 24 th ___ day of April, 2014, in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00767, it is ORDERED as follows: • My March 27, 2014 order [ECF No. 65] is VACATED; • Frankentek's motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaims is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: • On the breach of contract counterclaims, the motion is DENIED; • On the Pennsylvania statutory counterclaim and the New Jersey statutory counterclaim, the motion..
More
ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ___ 24th ___ day of April, 2014, in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00767, it is ORDERED as follows:
• My March 27, 2014 order [ECF No. 65] is VACATED;
• Frankentek's motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaims is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
• On the breach of contract counterclaims, the motion is DENIED;
• On the Pennsylvania statutory counterclaim and the New Jersey statutory counterclaim, the motion is DENIED;
• On the invasion of privacy counterclaim with respect to the Pennsylvania Property, the motion is GRANTED as conceded by the Buergers; and
• On the invasion of privacy counterclaim with respect to the New Jersey Property, the conversion counterclaim with respect to both properties, and the trespass counterclaim with respect to both properties, the motion is GRANTED.
AND NOW, this __ 24th ___ day of April, 2014, in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-03505, it is ORDERED as follows:
• My March 27, 2014 order [ECF No. 41] is VACATED;
• As stipulated by Frankentek on the record on April 22, 2013, Frankentek's claims, with the exception of the claim for the New Jersey Prompt Payment Act, are DISMISSED;
• As stipulated by the Buergers on the record on April 22, 2013, the Buergers' counterclaims are DISMISSED; and
• Frankentek's motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaims is DENIED as moot.
• AND NOW, this ___ 24th ____ day of April, 2014, in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00768, it is ORDERED as follows:
• My March 27, 2014 order [ECF No. 60] is VACATED;
• Frankentek's motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaims is DENIED as follows:
• On the breach of contract counterclaims, the motion is DENIED; and
• On the invasion of privacy, conversion, and trespass counterclaims, the motion is GRANTED as uncontested by the Buergers.
Source: Leagle
