BALAQUER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 13-6331. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140516a99
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2014, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's Response, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, the other documents filed by the parties, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol .Sandra Moore Wells, is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2014, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's Response, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, the other documents filed by the parties, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol .Sandra Moore Wells, is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2014, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's Response, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, the other documents filed by the parties, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol .Sandra Moore Wells, is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. Petitioner has neither shown a denial of any federal constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims on procedural grounds. Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
