Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ROSENBERG, 12-723. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140602d54 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: May 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge. AND NOW , this 30th day of May 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. No 101) and Defendant's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. With respect to Defendant's jury demand, the Motion is GRANTED , and the jury demand is STRICKEN ; 2. With respect to Plaintiff's request that the Co
More

ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. No 101) and Defendant's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. With respect to Defendant's jury demand, the Motion is GRANTED, and the jury demand is STRICKEN;

2. With respect to Plaintiff's request that the Court set this case for trial, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that with 14 days of the entry of this Order, the Parties through counsel shall jointly report to the Court in writing whether there are any outstanding discovery matters and if so, when the parties anticipate that discovery will be completed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer