KNOX v. HERMAN GEREL, LLP, 12-2238. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140626d14
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of June , 2014, upon consideration of Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF Nos. 8 & 9), Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Cross-Claim (ECF No. 26), and Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Herman Gerel's First Amended Cross-Claim (ECF No. 33), and all papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED
Summary: ORDER BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of June , 2014, upon consideration of Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF Nos. 8 & 9), Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Cross-Claim (ECF No. 26), and Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Herman Gerel's First Amended Cross-Claim (ECF No. 33), and all papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED a..
More
ORDER
BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF Nos. 8 & 9), Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Cross-Claim (ECF No. 26), and Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Herman Gerel's First Amended Cross-Claim (ECF No. 33), and all papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Plaintiff's Cross-Claim are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff Knox's claims for indemnification from UHI (Count Three of Plaintiff Knox's Complaint and Count One of Plaintiff Knox's Cross-Claim) are DISMISSED. Plaintiff Knox's claim for contribution from UHI (Count Two in Plaintiff Knox's Cross-Claim) is DISMISSED. As to all other claims in Plaintiff's Complaint and Plaintiff's Cross-Claim, UHI's Motions to Dismiss are DENIED.
2. Defendant United Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Herman Gerel's Cross-Claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Herman Gerel's claims for quantum meruit (Count Three of Defendant Herman Gerel's Cross-Claim) and unjust enrichment (Count Four of Defendant Herman Gerel's Cross-Claim) are DISMISSED. As to all other claims in Herman Gerel's Cross-Claim, UHI's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
