Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BERGER v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., 13-5195. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140627d22 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge. AND NOW , this 25th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 5, filed September 19, 2013), Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Document No. 22, filed October 7, 2013), and Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, I
More

ORDER

JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 5, filed September 19, 2013), Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Document No. 22, filed October 7, 2013), and Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Document No. 24, filed October 18, 2013), for the reasons set forth by Memorandum dated June 25, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Preliminary Pretrial Conference will be scheduled in due course.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer