Filed: Jul. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER L. FELIPE RESTREPO, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2014, in consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 10), and Plaintiff's response thereto, which is titled as a "Motion to Strike" (ECF No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED in part, as follows: 1. Defendants' motion, with regards to Plaintiff's breach of contract claim, is DENIED. 2. The remainder of Defendants' motion is GRANTED. 3. Pla
Summary: ORDER L. FELIPE RESTREPO, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2014, in consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 10), and Plaintiff's response thereto, which is titled as a "Motion to Strike" (ECF No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED in part, as follows: 1. Defendants' motion, with regards to Plaintiff's breach of contract claim, is DENIED. 2. The remainder of Defendants' motion is GRANTED. 3. Plai..
More
ORDER
L. FELIPE RESTREPO, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2014, in consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 10), and Plaintiff's response thereto, which is titled as a "Motion to Strike" (ECF No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED in part, as follows:
1. Defendants' motion, with regards to Plaintiff's breach of contract claim, is DENIED.
2. The remainder of Defendants' motion is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 13) is DENIED as moot.
4. A Rule 16 conference is scheduled for August 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM.
