Filed: Aug. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge AND NOW, this 6 th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Drygal, Givens-Walker, Chowdhury, Richtiger, and Wise for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Stay Pending Arbitration" (doc. no. 151) it is hereby ORDERED that: — The motion is GRANTED; and — The claims of Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Dryg
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge AND NOW, this 6 th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Drygal, Givens-Walker, Chowdhury, Richtiger, and Wise for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Stay Pending Arbitration" (doc. no. 151) it is hereby ORDERED that: — The motion is GRANTED; and — The claims of Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Dryga..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge
AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Drygal, Givens-Walker, Chowdhury, Richtiger, and Wise for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Stay Pending Arbitration" (doc. no. 151) it is hereby ORDERED that:
— The motion is GRANTED; and
— The claims of Plaintiffs Demrow, Harris, Shah, Anepete, Govoni-Drygal, Givens-Walker, Chowdhury, Richtiger, and Wise are DISMISSED without prejudice to their ability to pursue their claims in arbitration.
