Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CANNELLA v. BRENNAN, 2:12-CV-1247. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140815i38 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER, Judge. AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants McWilliams and Granite Financial Solutions Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 171) and Plaintiffs' Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 174), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Count III of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 156), and Count III
More

ORDER

J. CURTIS JOYNER, Judge.

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants McWilliams and Granite Financial Solutions Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 171) and Plaintiffs' Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 174), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Count III of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 156), and Count III is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, IV, V, and VI.1

FootNotes


1. Because Defendant Brennan did not file a motion to dismiss, Count III of the Second Amended Complaint is still applicable to her.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer