Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NEW-HOWARD v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 11-cv-2855. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140815p15 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER, District judge. AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 71), Defendant's Response thereto (Doc. No. 72), Plaintiff's Petition for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 75) and Defendant's Memorandum of Law in opposition thereto (Doc. Nos. 78, 79), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint to assert a claim for breach of th
More

ORDER

J. CURTIS JOYNER, District judge.

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 71), Defendant's Response thereto (Doc. No. 72), Plaintiff's Petition for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 75) and Defendant's Memorandum of Law in opposition thereto (Doc. Nos. 78, 79), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Plaintiff may amend her Complaint to assert a claim for breach of the February 2013 Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Count Four"). Plaintiff may not amend her Complaint to assert other claims.

Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer