LAFATE v. VANGUARD GROUP, INC., 13-cv-5555. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140908b98
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 34) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 37); Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 42) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 47); and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions (ECF No. 40) and Defendant's opposition th
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 34) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 37); Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 42) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 47); and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions (ECF No. 40) and Defendant's opposition the..
More
ORDER
LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 34) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 37); Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery (ECF No. 42) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 47); and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions (ECF No. 40) and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 50), and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery is DENIED;
(2) Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT; and
(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Source: Leagle
