Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER L. FELIPE RESTREPO, District Judge. AND NOW , this 16 th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant, Jacqueline A. Berrien, Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), for Summary Judgment (ECF Document 39), plaintiff's opposition thereto (Doc. 46), the Motion of Plaintiff, Kimberly Day-Lewis, for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), defendant's opposition thereto (Doc. 45), and the parties respective reply briefs (Docs. 57, 58), for th
Summary: ORDER L. FELIPE RESTREPO, District Judge. AND NOW , this 16 th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant, Jacqueline A. Berrien, Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), for Summary Judgment (ECF Document 39), plaintiff's opposition thereto (Doc. 46), the Motion of Plaintiff, Kimberly Day-Lewis, for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), defendant's opposition thereto (Doc. 45), and the parties respective reply briefs (Docs. 57, 58), for the..
More
ORDER
L. FELIPE RESTREPO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant, Jacqueline A. Berrien, Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), for Summary Judgment (ECF Document 39), plaintiff's opposition thereto (Doc. 46), the Motion of Plaintiff, Kimberly Day-Lewis, for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), defendant's opposition thereto (Doc. 45), and the parties respective reply briefs (Docs. 57, 58), for the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion (Doc. 39) is DENIED with respect to Count II (gender discrimination) of Plaintiff's Complaint to the extent plaintiff claims that defendant improperly restricted plaintiff from performing outside work;
2. Defendant's Motion (Doc. 39) is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's Count VI (retaliation) to the extent plaintiff claims that defendant improperly restricted her from performing outside employment, manipulating plaintiff's case inventory, and acting in an antagonistic course of conduct;
3. Defendant's Motion (Doc. 39) is GRANTED in all other respects;
4. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 37) is DENIED.
